BACKGROUND
Each day firefighters across the country combat fires and place themselves in
harm's way. The extent of risk to firefighters is related to a number of factors,
including how often they are exposed to working fires, the training and equipment they
bring to the task, staffing levels, the decision-making skills of fire officers,
discipline, building construction, and the exact nature of fire itself.
Though the overall number of structure fires continues to follow a downward
trend, today's building fires are burning hotter than in the past because more synthetics
and polycarbonate materials are used in construction and interior furnishings. The
economical, pre-fabricated, lightweight trusses that are commonly used are held together
with gusset plates that fail after a brief exposure to temperatures of 800 to 1000 degrees
F, which results in more rapid building collapse. Because of lightweight construction,
today's buildings are less resistant to fire and can be more dangerous environments in
which to fight fire, unless countered by working sprinkler systems.
Due to the declining numbers of structure fires, firefighters on the whole have
less fire ground experience than their predecessors had a generation ago. As many of the
more experienced firefighters and officers seek retirement, they are replaced by young
officers with comparably less fire experience. Complicating this situation is that live
fire training with Class A combustible materials (especially in acquired structures) is
being replaced by temperature-controlled, fuel-fed fires in non-combustible structures.
There are advantages to this type of training, but it is less realistic. Departments are
relying less on live fire training for myriad reasons, including among others
environmental, safety, and cost.
The personal protective gear being worn by firefighters today is excellent; some
say that it is even too protective. Firefighters now can advance deeper into structures
and get closer to the seat of a fire than in years past because the turnout gear protects
well against heat, but this can create problems. A longer exposure to fire will rapidly
deplete a firefighter's energy and air supply; and the firefighter will have a greater
distance to travel to an exit in an emergency situation. Furthermore, as firefighters
progress farther into a structure, more time elapses, which means the fire is more
developed, hotter, and often closer to flashover. Collapse becomes more likely because of
the increased damage from the fire.
As today's firefighters' collective experience in fighting fires continues to
diminish, there is great concern in the firefighter community that the inability to
recognize flashover and building collapse-and to react quickly enough to avoid being
caught by these two potentially fatal conditions-will continue to result in injuries and
fatalities to firefighters.
While ongoing prevention efforts, realistic training, effective policy
development, and firefighter discipline all can help reduce the risks of injury and death
on the job, the inherent dangers of firefighting require that fire departments prepare for
one of the most difficult assignments of all: rescuing one of their own. The use of rapid
intervention teams (RIT)-the subject of this report-can facilitate these rescues when an
emergency occurs. Rapid intervention teams are created specifically to rescue lost and
trapped firefighters; rescue of civilians is the responsibility of other crews on the fire
ground. There are different versions of RIT in communities throughout the country.
RAPID
INTERVENTION TEAMS -- (1.2 Mb)
This report provides the ground work for developing or improving the use of RITs
by fire departments. Included within the report are guidelines; suggested staffing levels
and associated responsibilities; recommended training and equipment; and notes on the
deployment of a RIT on the fire ground.
We contacted a group of fire departments by mail, interviewed fire department
personnel, talked to individuals who teach firefighter rescue nationally, and performed an
extensive literature review to discover how firefighter rescue currently is planned and
implemented out. The results of this research are incorporated into this report.